Proceeding details
Detention pending trial
Jerusalem Magistrates' Court
March 26, 2026
Charges and allegations
After indictment, the prosecution sought detention pending trial and relied on the alleged conduct and asserted dangerousness.
State's risk position
The State argued that no ordinary release alternative could sufficiently manage the alleged risk.
Defense submissions
The defense presented a structured, technically feasible alternative with a defined address, supervision, and restrictions.
Assessment of supervisors
The proposed supervisors were examined regarding reliability, understanding, availability, authority, and reporting duties.
Court decision
Judge Sigal Albo held that the purpose could be achieved through electronic monitoring and approved the alternative.
Conditions and practical result
The defendant moved from a custodial facility to electronically monitored detention under guarantor supervision and the court's detailed terms.
Privacy and outcome notice
Client names, case numbers, investigation-file numbers, and identifying details have been omitted. Allegations described in detention matters are not findings of guilt. Results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee a similar outcome.